Comparison of five different methodologies for evaluating ankle-foot orthosis stiffness.

BACKGROUND: The mechanical properties of an ankle-foot orthosis (AFO) play an important role in the gait mechanics of the end user. However, testing methodologies for evaluating these mechanical properties are not standardized. The purpose of this study was to compare five different evaluation frameworks to assess AFO stiffness. METHOD: The same 13 carbon composite AFOs were tested with five different methods. Four previously reported custom test fixtures (the BRUCE, KST, SMApp, and EMPIRE) rotated an AFO into dorsiflexion about a defined axis in the sagittal plane. The fifth method involved quasi-static deflection of AFOs into dorsiflexion by hanging weights (HW) from the footplate. AFO rotational stiffness was calculated as the linear fit of the AFO resistive torque and angular deflection. Differences between methods were assessed using descriptive statistics and a repeated measures Friedman with post-hoc Bonferroni-Holm adjusted Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. RESULTS: There were significant differences in measured AFO stiffnesses between test methods. Specifically, the BRUCE and HW methods measured lower stiffness than both the EMPIRE and the KST. Stiffnesses measured by the SMApp were not significantly different than any test method. Stiffnesses were lowest in the HW method, where motion was not constrained to a single plane. The median difference in absolute AFO stiffness across methods was 1.03 Nm/deg with a range of [0.40 to 2.35] Nm/deg. The median relative percent difference, measured as the range of measured stiffness from the five methods over the average measured stiffness was 62% [range 13% to 156%]. When the HW method was excluded, the four previously reported test fixtures produced a median difference in absolute AFO stiffness of 0.52 [range 0.38 to 2.17] Nm/deg with a relative percent difference between the methods of 27% [range 13% to 89%]. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the importance of developing mechanical testing standards, similar to those that exist for lower limb prosthetics. Lacking standardization, differences in methodology can result in large differences in measured stiffness, particularly for different constraints on motion. Non-uniform measurement practices may limit the clinical utility of AFO stiffness as a metric in AFO prescription and future research.

The effect of rotational speed on ankle-foot orthosis properties.

Ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs) are devices that support ankle motion. An AFO's sagittal plane rotational stiffness can affect gait kinematics. Because AFOs are often made from viscoelastic materials, their properties may vary at different walking speeds. The influence of rotational speed on AFO properties has not been thoroughly investigated. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the impact of rotational speed on AFO stiffness about the ankle. We tested a sample of one thermoplastic off-the-shelf AFO and two 3-D printed carbon fiber enforced nylon AFOs. Each AFO's dynamic resistance torque was measured as it was flexed at five speeds (5-100 °/s) using a custom-built measurement apparatus. We compared loading stiffness, neutral angle, and energy dissipation parameters for each AFO across speeds. Parameter values were generally greater at higher speeds. These effects were statistically significant for all AFOs (p≤0.002). However, differences in AFO stiffness and neutral angle across speeds were quite small (<0.6 Nm/° and <2.2 °). Changes in the thermoplastic AFO's stiffness were lower than the minimum detectable difference. Energy dissipation, as indicated by hysteresis area, increased by up to 6.3 J (about 250%) at the highest speed. This demonstrates that AFO flexion speed can influence the properties of different AFOs over the range typically achieved in human walking. Future work should assess whether the observed small variations of stiffness and neutral angle have a clinically meaningful impact on user performance, as well as explore effects of angular speed on a variety of AFO materials and designs.

The impact of ankle-foot orthosis stiffness on gait: A systematic literature review.

BACKGROUND: Ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs) are commonly prescribed to provide ankle support during walking. Current prescription standards provide general guidelines for choosing between AFO types, but are limited in terms of guiding specific design parameter choices. These design parameters affect the ankle stiffness of the AFO. RESEARCH QUESTION: The aim of this review was to investigate the impact of AFO stiffness on walking mechanics. METHODS: A literature search was conducted using three databases: Pubmed, Engineering Village, and Web of Science. RESULTS: After applying the exclusion criteria, 25 of 287 potential articles were included. The included papers tested a range of stiffnesses (0.02-8.17 Nm/deg), a variety of populations (e.g. healthy, post-stroke, cerebral palsy) and various gait outcome measures. Ankle kinematics were the most frequently reported measures and the most consistently affected by stiffness variations. Greater stiffnesses generally resulted in reduced peak ankle plantarflexion, dorsiflexion, and total range of motion, as well as increased dorsiflexion at initial contact. At the knee, a few studies reported increased flexion at initial contact, and decreased peak extension and increased peak flexion during stance when stiffness was increased. Stiffness did not affect hip kinetics and there was low evidence for its effects on hip or pelvis kinematics, ankle and knee kinetics, muscle activity, metabolic cost, ground reaction forces and spatiotemporal parameters. There were no generalizable trends for the impact of stiffness on user preference. SIGNIFICANCE: AFO stiffness is a key factor influencing ankle movement. Clear reporting standards for AFO design parameters, as well as additional high quality research is needed with larger sample sizes and different clinical populations to ascertain the true effect of stiffness on gait.

Low-back electromyography (EMG) data-driven load classification for dynamic lifting tasks.

OBJECTIVE: Numerous devices have been designed to support the back during lifting tasks. To improve the utility of such devices, this research explores the use of preparatory muscle activity to classify muscle loading and initiate appropriate device activation. The goal of this study was to determine the earliest time window that enabled accurate load classification during a dynamic lifting task. METHODS: Nine subjects performed thirty symmetrical lifts, split evenly across three weight conditions (no-weight, 10-lbs and 24-lbs), while low-back muscle activity data was collected. Seven descriptive statistics features were extracted from 100 ms windows of data. A multinomial logistic regression (MLR) classifier was trained and tested, employing leave-one subject out cross-validation, to classify lifted load values. Dimensionality reduction was achieved through feature cross-correlation analysis and greedy feedforward selection. The time of full load support by the subject was defined as load-onset. RESULTS: Regions of highest average classification accuracy started at 200 ms before until 200 ms after load-onset with average accuracies ranging from 80% (±10%) to 81% (±7%). The average recall for each class ranged from 69-92%. CONCLUSION: These inter-subject classification results indicate that preparatory muscle activity can be leveraged to identify the intent to lift a weight up to 100 ms prior to load-onset. The high accuracies shown indicate the potential to utilize intent classification for assistive device applications. SIGNIFICANCE: Active assistive devices, e.g. exoskeletons, could prevent back injury by off-loading low-back muscles. Early intent classification allows more time for actuators to respond and integrate seamlessly with the user.